I think to keep within (what I believe are) the foundations of fotofora, it would be wise to
avoid groups based on tools.
That is to say let's
not have the Canon weekly and the Nikon weekly, etc.
On that note - I kind of like "Wide Angle Wednesday", it's not manufacture restrictive, however I wouldn't cry if it went away.
I am inclined toward broadly defined with not many restrictions. I think two base concepts here are to share, and to grow; for example I personally wouldn't get my knickers in twist if there were a group 'wildlife' and there appeared a man-made element in the shot. Simple 'rules' are the best rules, I think.
My two suggestions for the expansion of Groups are:
> "Our Physical World" Group - that means loosely any 'landscape form' including seascape, cityscape, skyscape, architecture, cave-drawings . . .
> "People in our World" Group - that comprises and 'people shot' - street, posed portraiture, candid portraiture, sport . . .
(Obviously), many photos would overlap those two groups, however the main subject would dictate into what group an image was placed: I think a key element in the communication of an image's meaning, is, that what is the main subject, is essentially, obvious.
WW
"Our Physical World" -
North Cronulla Beach - Winter, Fuji X100s, Hoya R72
©AlexJordanGroupWMW