Messing about today, I decided to explore ChatGPT, and find out what it could tell me about myself. Here is the story.
I first signed in with my Google account. Then I asked it about myself and said that I lived in New York. On the first round I was given an answer that there were too many of me here in NY, and I needed to be more specific. Hmmm...
CGPT follows the conversation and extends it, so this time I simply entered what ‘his’ website address is. This was the response:
Nope, no joy here either. After a few more rounds of refining the questions, it presented me with this:
No amount of coercion could convince this sage that I did not live in the City. It must suffer from the same concept that much of America does, in that the entire state is just an extension of the Big Apple.
To get this information, it robbed and rephrased language from my artist statement, and whatever ephemera it encountered about my images. But I must say, it is a better elevator statement than the one I currently have! At this point, I told it the last answer was better, and ‘regenerated’ the answer. Now it added an entire paragraph about my portrait work—which was a collage of my work and that of the first photographer they alluded to.
Attempts to refine this became increasingly inconsistent and off-target. I also saw how someone could game the system by providing information that it whipped around and provided some rephrased reply reflecting that erroneous information. This thing loves to rephrase things to appear original.
I think I will wait a bit before asking this turkey anything else…
I first signed in with my Google account. Then I asked it about myself and said that I lived in New York. On the first round I was given an answer that there were too many of me here in NY, and I needed to be more specific. Hmmm...
CGPT follows the conversation and extends it, so this time I simply entered what ‘his’ website address is. This was the response:
Thank you for providing Patrick Thrush's photography website. After visiting the website, I can see that Patrick Thrush is a fine art photographer based in New York City. He specializes in creating black and white images of architecture, landscapes, and cityscapes.
One of his projects is called "The Art of Abandoned Spaces," where he photographs abandoned buildings and structures in various states of decay. He captures the beauty of these forgotten places and explores the relationship between architecture and the natural world.
Another project of his is called "Cityscapes," where he captures the bustling energy and architectural beauty of New York City. He uses a unique blend of long exposure and black and white photography to create stunning images that showcase the city's iconic landmarks.
Overall, Patrick Thrush's photography is characterized by a strong sense of composition, attention to detail, and a deep appreciation for the beauty of the built environment.
Nope, no joy here either. After a few more rounds of refining the questions, it presented me with this:
After looking at https://papatango.photography, it appears that Patrick Thrush is a fine art photographer based in New York City. His work primarily focuses on cityscapes and objects, showcasing the beauty and energy of the urban and textual environments.
In particular, his work often features bold, vibrant colors and striking compositions, capturing the dynamic interplay of light and shadow in his subjects. He also employs a variety of techniques, such as long exposures and intentional camera movement, to create unique and evocative images.
Overall, Patrick Thrush's photography showcases a deep appreciation for the beauty and complexity of the world around us. His images are both visually stunning and thought-provoking, inviting viewers to reflect on their own experiences of the world and the ways in which we interact with it.
No amount of coercion could convince this sage that I did not live in the City. It must suffer from the same concept that much of America does, in that the entire state is just an extension of the Big Apple.
To get this information, it robbed and rephrased language from my artist statement, and whatever ephemera it encountered about my images. But I must say, it is a better elevator statement than the one I currently have! At this point, I told it the last answer was better, and ‘regenerated’ the answer. Now it added an entire paragraph about my portrait work—which was a collage of my work and that of the first photographer they alluded to.
Attempts to refine this became increasingly inconsistent and off-target. I also saw how someone could game the system by providing information that it whipped around and provided some rephrased reply reflecting that erroneous information. This thing loves to rephrase things to appear original.
I think I will wait a bit before asking this turkey anything else…